Text 7A2-II
In October 1971, a gentleman called Frieder Nake published a note entitled, There Should Be No Computer Art, which I quote here. “Soon after the advent of computers, it became clear that there was a great potential application for them in the area of artistic creation”, he began. “Before 1960, amazing, large, expensive, digital computers helped to produce poetic text and music. Analog computers, or only oscilloscopes, generated drawings of sets of mathematical curves and representations of oscillations. It was not before the first exhibitions of computer produced pictures were held in 1965 that a greater public took notice of this threat, as some said, progress, as some thought. I was involved in this development from its beginning.
I think that the way the art scene reacted to the new creations is interesting, pleasing, and stupid. I stated in 1970 that I was no longer going to take part in exhibitions. I find it easy to admit that computer art did not contribute to the advancement of art if we compare the computer products to all existing works of art. In other words, the repertoire of results of aesthetic behavior has not been changed by the use of computers. This point of view, namely, that of art history, is shared and held against computer art by many art critics. There is no doubt in my mind”, Frieder Nake said, “that interesting new methods have been found in the last decade which can be of some significance for the creative artist”.
As you might imagine, this was a bit of a controversial take. Here was a man who had for part of the previous decade been an insider, an advocate for the use of algorithmic and generative processes to create art. However, he was now seeing things from another perspective. I’ll just finish with another piece from what he posted in that article: “Questions like ‘is a computer creative’, or ‘is a computer an artist’, or the like, should not be considered serious questions, period. In the light of what we are facing at the end of the 20th century, those irrelevant questions do not matter”.
Where is the Art? A History in Technology.
Internet: <https://www.infoq.com> (adapted).
Each of the following options presents a different version of the last sentence of the second paragraph of text 7A2-II. Choose the option in which not only are the correctness and the original meaning of the fragment maintained, but also is the reported indirect speech used correctly.
- A Frieder Nake acknowledged that he had no doubt in his mind that interesting new methods have been found in the last decade which could have been of some significance for the creative artist.
- B Frieder Nake said that there was no doubt in his mind that interesting new methods had been found in the previous decades which could be of significance for the creative artist.
- C Frieder Nake said that there was no doubt in his mind that interesting new methods have been found in the last decade which could be of some significance for the creative artist.
- D Frieder Nake stated that “there is no doubt in his mind that interesting new methods had been found in the previous decades which can be of some significance for the creative artist.”
- E Frieder Nake declared that, there was no doubt in his mind, that, in the last decade, interesting new methods have been found which could be of some significance for the creative artist.